Journal Articles

Co-Producing Art’s Cognitive Value (Forthcoming)

The British Journal of Aesthetics

Published VersionPre-Proof Version

  • After viewing a painting, reading a novel, or seeing a film, audiences often feel that they improve their cognitive standing on the world beyond the canvas, page, or screen. To learn from art in this way, I argue audiences must employ high degrees of epistemic autonomy and creativity, engaging in a process I call ‘insight through art.’ Some have worried that insight through art uses audience achievements to explain an artwork’s cognitive an artistic value, thereby failing to properly appreciate the cognitive and artistic achievements of artists. I move against this worry by arguing that in order to learn via insight through art audiences must collaborate with artists, sharing the labour and credit for the cognitive achievements they co-produce. I claim this co-productive outlook reveals that our appreciation of art’s cognitive and artistic value involves far more audience participation than has hitherto been realised.

Heterogeneity and Historicity: On What Makes Art Contemporary (Forthcoming)

Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics

Pre-Proof Version

  • Contemporary art is a category that can admit art made in any medium, form, genre, and style. However, this unprecedented heterogeneity can make it difficult to understand what makes contemporary art distinct from other kinds of art. In this article, I aim to provide an account of what makes art contemporary. I develop my position by focussing on philosophy of contemporary art emerging from the so-called analytic tradition. I argue that though these philosophers have reckoned with many of the puzzles posed by contemporary art’s heterogeneity, they fail to provide compelling theories of what makes art contemporary. In response, I propose that the best way to understand what makes an artwork contemporary is by understanding how it attempts to grapple with the issues of its own historical condition of ‘contemporaneity.’

Empowering Young Voices through Performance Poetry (Forthcoming)

(co-authored with Andrew Cooper and Karen Simecek)

The Journal of Philosophy of Education

  • In this paper we examine the potential power of writing and performing poetry to enable the participation of young people from marginalised backgrounds to participate in political processes through the experience of having their voice acknowledged. Our method is to combine philosophical analysis with the design and implementation of a workshop series on writing and performing poetry with a small group of marginalised young people from Coventry. After sharing the results of the study, we then reflect on two poems written by young people who performed their work at a celebration event at the Belgrade Theatre in Coventry in September 2022. From both philosophical and empirical grounds, we argue that writing and performing poetry can play an important role in political education, for it opens space for what we call ‘the acknowledgment of voice’. 

Artistic Exceptionalism and the Risks of Activist Art (2023)

The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism

Published VersionPre-Proof Version

  • Activist artists often face a difficult question: is striving to change the world undermined when pursued through difficult and experimental artistic means? Looking closely at Adrian Piper's Four Intruders plus Alarm Systems (1980), I consider why this is an important concern for activist art, and assess three different responses in relation to Piper’s work. What I call the conciliatory stance recommends that when activist artists encounter misunderstanding, they should downplay their experimental artistry in favor of fitting their work to their audience's appreciative capacities. What I call the steadfast stance recommends that activist artists have reason to use their privilege of artistic exceptionalism to challenge their audience's expectations, even if this leads to misunderstanding. I argue that a middle position that I call liberal conciliation best balances the demands for actual change placed on activism and the experimental means that artists bring to activism.

Book Reviews

Review of Jukka Mikkonen’s Philosophy, Literature, and Understanding: On Reading and Cognition (2022)

The British Journal of Aesthetics

Published VersionPre-Proof Version

In Progress

Please email for drafts

Epistemic Discipline and Artistic Exceptionalism

  • Within the philosophy of art, cognitivists aim to answer two questions: 1) how do artworks improve our epistemic standing? 2) does an artwork’s cognitive value contribute to its value qua art? Over recent years, cognitivists have had much success in answering these two questions. However, in this presentation I will argue that cognitivists routinely overlook an important factor relevant to explaining how we learn from art. Taking my cue from recent work in social epistemology, I propose that cognitivists should pay closer attention to how the epistemic and social norms cultivated within artworlds help or hinder our ability to learn from and appreciate art. However, I will argue that once we turn our attention to this, we find that artworlds are unlike other kinds of epistemic communities. Rather than cultivate the normative stability – or ‘epistemic discipline’ – that other domains of inquiry take to be central to explaining their epistemic successes, artworlds appear to cultivate precisely the opposite. Artworlds encourage artists to break norms and to explore weird, demanding, and opaque approaches to inquiry. I contend this opens up a new front for debate between cognitivists and anti-cognitivists over the epistemic and artistic opportunities and hazards offered by being undisciplined.

Aesthetics and the Unfolding of History

  • When faced with sudden public tragedies, wars, or pandemics we often feel like we are suddenly ‘living through history.’ In this paper, I attempt to understand what might meant when we issue such a statement, and how aesthetic artifacts are often central to helping us express these abrupt shift in experience. I claim that we experience the present as history when we become aware of the ways our intersecting interpretations of the past and future shape what we take to be meaningful in the present. Looking at philosophical accounts of memorial art, I argue that these help us to understand how aesthetic objects play an important role in helping us to record and share this change in existential outlook.

The Nostalgic, the Progressive, and the Urgent: Aesthetic Concepts and Historicity

  • When making aesthetic judgements, we often describe the objects of our judgements using terms like ‘nostalgic’, ‘fashionable’, ‘unfashionable’, ‘anachronistic’, ‘retro’, ‘vintage’, ‘futuristic’, ‘progressive’, ‘traditional’, ‘urgent’, ‘timely’, ‘topical’, and ‘timeless.’ I argue that these terms constitute a distinct class of aesthetic concepts. When we use these terms, we do more than just express the sensory and affective impact of an artifact. We also issue a judgement on the particular interpretation of the relationship between past, present, and future that we take the artifact to express: what I call its ‘historicity.’ In some cases, I claim we also reach for these terms to express a comparison between the historicity the artifact expresses and our own sense of our place in history. When we enter into debates with others about whether or not an artifact is fashionable, nostalgic, or timeless, and whether it should be praised or criticised for being so, I claim that we are engaging in an aesthetic discourse with a hitherto overlooked existential urgency. We are doing nothing less than trying to take a stand on the meaningfulness of history.

Philosophy for the Arts?

(co-authored with Hans Maes)

  • Philosophers regularly study philosophical issues raised by the arts. They also sometimes propose that artworks can do philosophy. However, philosophers have not questioned how exactly philosophy might directly help artists create art. We call this ‘philosophy for the arts’, and in this article we aim to give an outline of what this intellectual and practical project might look like, how it might relate to other kinds of philosophical engagement with art, and how it can reveal tacit assumptions guiding the standard methods of philosophical engagement with art.